Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Crypto Asset Fund, LLC et al v. Medcredits, Inc. et al
Case Number:
3:19-cv-01869
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
-
March 31, 2020
Crypto Fund, Telemedicine Firm Must Arbitrate Claims
A California federal judge said Monday that a cryptocurrency fund and a blockchain telemedicine company had agreed to arbitrate their disagreements, and must do so to resolve their dispute over the fund's investment in the company's allegedly fraudulent initial coin offering.
-
January 07, 2020
Telemed Startup Says Fraud Accuser Can't Avoid Arbitration
A blockchain-based telemedicine platform is not backing down from pursuing arbitration in a dispute over another firm's claims that it was swindled out of more than $1 million in the platform's sham token venture.
-
November 22, 2019
Telemed Startup Says Crypto Fraud Suit Belongs In Arbitration
A blockchain-based telemedicine platform urged a California federal judge Thursday to dismiss a case brought by its investors so that it may push the fraud claims to arbitration, arguing both sides agreed in their contract to arbitrate any disputes.
-
September 30, 2019
Crypto Firm Accuses Telemed Startup Of Investment Scam
Cryptocurrency investors have sued a telemedicine startup in California federal court for allegedly swindling them out of more than $1 million, not providing the promised services and diverting their funds to a new venture.