PINNELL et al v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. et al

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

2:19-cv-05738

Court:

Pennsylvania Eastern

Nature of Suit:

Labor: E.R.I.S.A.

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

MARK A. KEARNEY

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. November 19, 2020

    Teva Inks $2.55M Deal To Settle 401(k) Fee Suit

    Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. has agreed to pay nearly $2.6 million to wrap up a proposed ERISA class action accusing it of including unnecessarily costly investments in a 401(k) plan that also allegedly charged too much for administrative fees, according to documents filed in Pennsylvania federal court.

  2. October 16, 2020

    Teva, Workers Reach Deal To Settle 401(k) Fee Suit

    A Pennsylvania federal judge gave Teva Pharmaceuticals the go-ahead Friday to draw up settlement paperwork in a deal with roughly 10,000 current and former workers in a lawsuit over the drugmaker's 401(k) plan fees and investments.

  3. March 31, 2020

    Teva Can't Nix ERISA Suit Over Excessive Fee Allegations

    A Pennsylvania federal judge on Tuesday denied a bid by Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. to toss a proposed class action accusing the drugmaker of saddling its 401(k) plan participants with excessive fees, saying the U.S. Supreme Court's denial this week of a plan's petition for certiorari provided "guideposts" on the ruling.

  4. March 04, 2020

    Teva Wants 'Scattershot' 401(k) Fee Suit Scrapped

    Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. has urged a Pennsylvania federal judge to toss a "scattershot" proposed class action accusing the drugmaker of saddling participants in its 401(k) plan with excessive fees, arguing it wasn't obligated to choose the cheapest possible investment options.

  5. December 09, 2019

    Workers Say Teva 401(k) Mismanagement Cost Them Millions

    Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. has been hit with a proposed class action accusing the company of costing participants in its 401(k) retirement plan millions of dollars by keeping high-cost investment choices in the plan and not properly reviewing its investment lineup.