Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Alfonso v. Cumulus Media, Inc. et al
Case Number:
1:20-cv-00847
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 18, 2021
Ex-Worker's Separation Pact Sinks Cumulus ERISA Suit
A Georgia federal court threw out a proposed class action accusing radio broadcaster Cumulus Media Inc. of loading its retirement plan with excessive fees, ruling that a separation agreement signed by the ex-worker behind the suit precluded his suit.
-
May 13, 2021
Cumulus Says Worker's Separation Pact Blocks ERISA Suit
Cumulus Media urged a Georgia federal judge to deal the final blow to a proposed class action accusing it of mismanaging employees' retirement plan, saying the sole remaining named plaintiff had signed an "unambiguous" separation agreement that blocked him from suing.
-
December 17, 2020
Cumulus Media Beats Suit Over 401(k) Fees
A Georgia federal judge threw out a proposed class action against Cumulus Media Inc. on Thursday, ruling that two ex-workers who claimed their 401(k) plan was saddled with excessive fees waited too long to file suit.
-
May 29, 2020
Cumulus Media Says Time Limit Spells Doom For 401(k) Suit
Cumulus Media wants to dismantle a proposed class action claiming it loaded its 401(k) plan with expensive investment choices and didn't rein in recordkeeping costs, arguing that most of the misconduct alleged by the ex-workers behind the suit is too old to sue over.