Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Szwanek et al v. Jack in the Box, Inc. et al
Case Number:
3:20-cv-02953
Court:
Nature of Suit:
American with Disabilities - Other
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 01, 2020
Jack In The Box Beats Blind Bias Suit Over Night Drive-Thru
A California federal judge on Thursday dismissed a proposed class action alleging Jack in the Box's drive-thru-only policy during late-night hours discriminates against visually impaired people, saying it only disproportionately impacts a very narrow group of people who are not disabled within the scope of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
-
April 30, 2020
Jack In The Box Late-Night Policy Unfair To Blind, Suit Says
Fast-food chain Jack in the Box was hit with a proposed class action Wednesday in California federal court alleging the restaurant's drive-thru-only policy during late-night hours constitutes "systemic civil rights violations" against visually impaired people.