June 29, 2021
A Pennsylvania federal judge on Tuesday again tossed claims that Under Armour broke antitrust laws, saying a manufacturer of "bioceramic" textile treatments — intended to help athletes' muscles recover faster — still hasn't adequately defined the relevant market, but will give the company one more chance to plead its case.
April 13, 2021
A Pennsylvania manufacturer can't bring antitrust claims against Under Armour Inc. for allegedly freezing it out of the market for specialty clothing because its definition of that market was a broad and "unworkable muddle," Under Armour told a federal court.
March 04, 2021
A Pittsburgh federal judge benched claims that Under Armour Inc. had broken false advertising and antitrust laws because a manufacturer of "bioceramic" textile treatments — intended to help athletes' muscles recover faster — hadn't adequately shown that it was a direct competitor in a relevant market.
February 23, 2021
Under Armour Inc. says a Pennsylvania manufacturer of a textile spray intended to improve athletes' muscle recovery can't sue Under Armour for anti-competitive behavior because it is not a direct competitor, an attorney for the athletic wear company told a federal judge Tuesday.
June 24, 2020
A textile spray manufacturer has no grounds to pursue an antitrust and false advertising complaint against Under Armour, the sportswear company told a Pennsylvania federal judge Tuesday.
May 06, 2020
Under Armour is facing an antitrust suit in Pennsylvania federal court by the manufacturer of a textile spray that promotes athletes' recovery for allegedly "strong-arming" other companies from doing work with the business.