Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Omnitracs, LLC et al v. Platform Science, Inc.
Case Number:
3:20-cv-00958
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- DLA Piper
- Fish & Richardson
- Greenberg Traurig
- King & Spalding
- Kirkland & Ellis
- McCurdy Laud
- Ruttenberg IP Law
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 02, 2025
Omnitracs' $19M Patent Trial Jury Win Tossed By Calif. Judge
A California federal judge has overruled a jury's holding that Platform Science willfully infringed one of Qualcomm spinoff Omnitracs' fleet management software patents and vacated the resulting $19 million verdict, finding that the plaintiffs' expert gave faulty testimony.
-
September 06, 2024
Platform Science Fights $19.3M Software Patent Verdict
Platform Science Inc. has urged a California federal judge to erase a jury's verdict that it owes $19.3 million to Qualcomm spinoff Omnitracs LLC for infringing its fleet management software patent, arguing that the verdict is improper and that the court should overturn it or order a new trial.
-
July 19, 2024
Platform Sciences Hit With $19M Omnitracs Patent Verdict
A California federal jury on Friday determined that Qualcomm spin-off Omnitracs is entitled to $19.3 million in lost profits and a $140,000 royalty after a former executive's new company willfully infringed one of its fleet management software patents, but cleared it of infringing two other patents.