Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC et al v. R.J. REYNOLDS VAPOR COMPANY
Case Number:
1:20-cv-00472
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Cooley LLP
- Hill Ward Henderson
- Jones Day
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Paul Weiss
- Perkins Coie
- Weil Gotshal
- Williams Mullen
- Womble Bond
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 25, 2025
Judge Lets RJ Reynolds, Altria Seal Docs From Juul Deal
A federal judge in North Carolina on Tuesday granted requests by tobacco giant R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. and rival Philip Morris' parent company to seal documents in their ongoing royalty dispute, keeping details of their licensing agreements with the vape brand JUUL confidential.
-
September 03, 2024
R.J. Reynolds Stresses Reason To End $95M Royalties To Altria
Tobacco giant R.J. Reynolds is pushing hard on a bid to end $95 million in royalty payments it owes to the parent company of Philip Morris after a patent infringement verdict, emphasizing to a North Carolina federal court that its deal with Juul to license vape pen technology can in fact be enforced retroactively.
-
August 15, 2024
Juul License Doesn't Negate R.J. Reynolds' Royalties, Altria Says
The parent company of Philip Morris is pushing back on what it described as a delayed bid by R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. to skirt paying royalties on a pod-style vape, telling a North Carolina federal court that an "after-the-fact sublicense" with Juul isn't enough to undo the ongoing payments.
-
July 03, 2024
Juul License Voids Vape Royalties For Altria, Reynolds Argues
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. said it shouldn't have to pay royalties to the parent company of Philip Morris for a pod-style vape it was found to have infringed in a $95 million patent verdict nearly two years ago, pointing to a recent licensing deal it signed with Juul.
-
February 02, 2024
BAT, Philip Morris Reach Patent Deal For Global Vape IP Fights
British American Tobacco and Philip Morris International Inc. said Friday that the companies had come to a settlement resolving multiple heated tobacco and vape patent infringement suits.
-
January 27, 2023
RJ Reynolds Stuck With Ongoing Royalties After Vape Verdict
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. must pay the parent company of Philip Morris ongoing royalties for a pod-style vape it was found to have infringed in a $95 million patent verdict last year, though not at the rate its rival had requested, a North Carolina federal judge ruled Friday.
-
January 12, 2023
No Redo For RJ Reynolds After $95M Vape Patent Verdict
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. on Thursday lost a bid for a new trial in a vape patent case that sacked it a $95 million judgment, despite a North Carolina federal judge finding that opposing counsel had stepped out of line during cross-examination of an expert witness in front of the jury.
-
November 03, 2022
RJ Reynolds Snubs Bid For Royalties After $95M Vape Verdict
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. has rebuffed a bid by Philip Morris' parent company to double the royalty rate for a pod-style vape that Reynolds was found to have infringed, saying nothing has changed since the jury rendered its $95 million verdict meriting that kind of rate hike.
-
November 02, 2022
RJ Reynolds Wants New Trial After $95M Vape Patent Verdict
Nearly two months after a North Carolina federal jury declared that R.J. Reynolds owes Philip Morris' parent company $95 million for copying its pod-style vape design, the tobacco behemoth is telling the court it deserves a new trial.
-
October 06, 2022
Altria Wants Ongoing Royalties After $95M Vape Patent Verdict
The parent company of Philip Morris wants to double the ongoing royalty rate for a pod-style vape that R.J. Reynolds was found to have infringed in a $95 million patent verdict last month, saying the product's popularity warrants an uptick in payment.