Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Netlist Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Case Number:
8:20-cv-00993
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Bird Marella
- Gibson Dunn
- Hogan Lovells
- Irell & Manella
- Kahana & Feld
- Kendall Brill
- McDermott Will & Schulte
- O'Melveny & Myers
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 14, 2022
Samsung Wants Reversal Of Netlist's Zero-Dollar Breach Win
Samsung urged a California federal judge during a hearing on Monday to reverse his summary judgment ruling that it breached a joint development and patent license deal with Netlist, arguing that a jury's subsequent decision to award Netlist zero damages shows that no breach ever occurred.
-
December 06, 2021
Samsung Doesn't Owe Netlist For Contract Breach, Jury Finds
A California federal jury found Friday that Samsung doesn't owe damages for failing to fulfill Netlist's orders for computer memory products in breach of their deal, handing a win to the electronics giant following a judge's ruling in October that Samsung had breached the parties' joint development and patent license agreement.
-
October 26, 2021
Samsung Broke Patent Deal With Netlist, Calif. Judge Says
Samsung broke its obligations under a patent license agreement with Netlist over modular memory technology and Netlist subsequently terminated the deal, but a jury must decide any damages, a California federal judge said in an unsealed order entered Monday.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next →