Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Netlist Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Case Number:
8:20-cv-00993
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Bird Marella
- Gibson Dunn
- Hogan Lovells
- Irell & Manella
- Kahana & Feld
- Kendall Brill
- McDermott Will & Emery
- O'Melveny & Myers
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 26, 2021
Samsung Broke Patent Deal With Netlist, Calif. Judge Says
Samsung broke its obligations under a patent license agreement with Netlist over modular memory technology and Netlist subsequently terminated the deal, but a jury must decide any damages, a California federal judge said in an unsealed order entered Monday.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next →