Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Torres et al v. Starbucks Corporation
Case Number:
8:20-cv-01311
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 21, 2026
Starbucks Settles COBRA Suit From Ex-Worker's Spouse
Starbucks has agreed to settle a proposed class action from employee health plan participants and their beneficiaries alleging lapses in the coffee chain retailer's post-employment medical insurance notices, according to filings in Florida federal court.
-
March 16, 2021
Starbucks Can't Make Worker's Spouse Arbitrate COBRA Suit
Starbucks can't force a former worker's husband to arbitrate his claims that the coffee chain violated federal law by not informing him about continuing benefits under his wife's health care plan after she was fired, a Florida federal judge has ruled.
-
June 09, 2020
Ex-Starbucks Worker Steamed Over 'Confusing' COBRA Info
Starbucks has become the latest company accused of violating federal benefits law by failing to properly alert departing employees about their right to keep their health insurance, after a former worker lodged a proposed class action claiming the coffee chain sent out "confusing" COBRA notices.