Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Lopez et al v. Barr et al
Case Number:
0:20-cv-01330
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Government Agencies
-
January 20, 2021
Court Can't Hear Suit Over Immigration Case Closure Limits
A Minnesota federal judge on Tuesday tossed a challenge to restrictions on immigration judges' authority to table lower-priority cases, ruling that the claims do not clear the jurisdictional bar preventing district courts from reviewing those types of immigration decisions.
-
August 17, 2020
Feds Fight Bid To Reinstate Immigration Case Closures
The government has urged a Minnesota federal court to throw out a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration's decision to restrict immigration judges' authority to table lower-priority cases, claiming that courts can't review those kinds of immigration decisions.
-
June 09, 2020
Minn. Suit Seeks Review Of Immigrant Case Closures Limit
Federal immigration authorities were hit with a proposed class action in Minnesota federal court Tuesday as a group of immigrants seeks judicial review of a decision by former U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions that limited immigration judges' ability to administratively close cases, saying the policy violates the Administrative Procedure Act.