Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
National Association of Consumer Advocates et al v. Kraninger et al
Case Number:
1:20-cv-11141
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Judge:
Companies
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
November 30, 2021
CFPB Hatches Deal To Settle Suit Over Trump-Era Task Force
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and consumer advocates that had filed a suit seeking to bar the agency from adopting the recommendations of a Trump-era task force have reached a settlement agreement, with the agency agreeing that it violated federal law.
-
February 26, 2021
CFPB Can't Shake Challenge To Financial Law Taskforce
A Boston federal magistrate judge has ruled that consumer advocates can proceed with their lawsuit that seeks to bar the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau from adopting the recommendations of a Trump-era task force convened to study potential changes to federal consumer financial law.
-
August 18, 2020
CFPB Seeks To Blunt Challenge To Financial Law 'Taskforce'
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau on Monday hit back at a lawsuit challenging its creation of a "taskforce" to review federal consumer financial laws, telling a Boston federal court that the consumer advocates behind the litigation lack standing to get the advisory panel shut down.