Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company et al v. Classic Dining Group LLC et al
Case Number:
1:20-cv-04434
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
-
November 04, 2020
Insurer's COVID-19 Suit 'Redundant' Amid Eateries' Claims
An Illinois federal judge has thrown out a suit by State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Co. aiming to avoid covering claims from a group of Denny's and Ruby Tuesday owners for business interruption insurance stemming from COVID-19, saying the insurer's suit covers the exact same legal ground as the restaurants' own suit in state court.
-
August 31, 2020
Eateries Blast Insurer's Virus Coverage Suit As Redundant
A group of Denny's and Ruby Tuesday franchise restaurants has urged an Illinois federal judge to ax a suit from an insurer seeking not to cover the eateries' pandemic-related losses, arguing that the action raises exactly the same issues as the group's suit against the insurer in Ohio state court.
-
July 29, 2020
Insurer Says It Shouldn't Cover Restaurants' COVID-19 Losses
State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Co. asked an Illinois federal judge Wednesday to declare it has no duty to cover the losses 31 franchise restaurants suffered under state-mandated coronavirus closures, arguing the losses aren't covered in the relevant policies.