Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Vampire Family Brands, LLC v. SC Cramele Recas SA, et al
Case Number:
2:20-cv-08223
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
-
January 26, 2021
Importer Says 'Bloody' Wine Doesn't Step On 'Vampire' TM
A New York importer is looking to wash its hands of trademark infringement allegations by the maker of a "Vampire" wine, telling a California federal court that the winemaker's mark doesn't permit it to block a "Bloody Merlot" from the "Land of the Blood Suckers."
-
September 09, 2020
Vampire Wine Curses Rival For 'Bloody' TM Infringement
Selling "Vampire" wine in a coffin and imploring bloodthirsty fans, including early customer Alice Cooper, to "sip the blood of the vine" is the pure domain of Vampire Family Brands, according to a trademark infringement suit lodged Tuesday in California federal court.