Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Procaccianti Companies Inc et al v. Zurich American Insurance Company
Case Number:
1:20-cv-00512
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 19, 2023
Zurich Escapes RI Hotelier's Virus Coverage Suit
A Rhode Island federal judge sided with Zurich American Insurance in a COVID-19 business interruption suit brought by two hospitality companies, finding they did not show the virus physically altered their properties.
-
September 02, 2021
Zurich American Must Face Hotelier's Virus Coverage Suit
A Rhode Island federal judge ruled Thursday that Zurich American Insurance Co. can't escape a hotelier's coverage claims for COVID-19-related losses at the motion to dismiss stage, finding the case should move on to discovery.
-
January 13, 2021
Zurich American Tries To Sink Hotelier's Virus Coverage Suit
Zurich American Insurance Co. has asked a Rhode Island federal judge to toss a hotelier's coverage claims for COVID-19-related losses, arguing its policy expressly excludes viruses as a covered cause of loss and that a raft of similar suits around the country have already been thrown out.
-
December 09, 2020
Hotel Co. Hits Zurich American With COVID-19 Loss Suit
Hotel operator Procaccianti has sued Zurich American for failing to cover losses it incurred during statewide COVID-19 shutdown orders, arguing in Rhode Island federal court that the presence of the disease at its hotels entitles it to coverage under its $300 million policy.