Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Zay Toon Inc. v. GrubHub Holdings Inc.
Case Number:
1:21-cv-01590
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 23, 2021
Arbitration On The Menu In Grubhub Commissions Suit
A restaurant company's Illinois federal court suit against Grubhub claiming it charges 10% to 20% commissions on phone calls even if they don't result in takeout or delivery orders has been terminated, after the parties indicated they're heading to arbitration.
-
March 24, 2021
Grubhub Hit With Class Suit Over Restaurant Phone Orders
Grubhub has been hit with a proposed class action in Illinois federal court claiming the online food-ordering company wrongly charges as many as 300,000 restaurants nationwide for commissions of 10% to 20% on phone calls that don't result in takeout or delivery orders.