Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Lyft, Inc. v. Quartz Auto Technologies LLC
Case Number:
4:21-cv-01871
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
-
April 24, 2024
Lyft Denied $1M Fees In Patent Suit Because Of Previous Deal
A California federal judge on Tuesday denied Lyft Inc.'s request for $1 million in attorney fees in its patent dispute against Quartz Auto Technologies LLC, saying the parties' agreement to dismiss certain claims clearly stated that each party would "bear its own costs and attorneys' fees."
-
June 22, 2022
Lyft Told To Wait Before Attacking Tech Patents Again
A federal judge in California told lawyers for Lyft on Wednesday that they would have to wait until the end of claim construction to start arguing that language in patents initially developed by researchers at IBM covering wireless communication technology was too abstract for patent protection.
-
September 08, 2021
Patent Holder Can't Escape Lyft's Noninfringement Case
A California federal judge has refused to toss Lyft Inc.'s suit claiming that it does not infringe a series of Quartz Auto Technologies patents covering GPS and autonomous vehicle and device locator technology, finding that the court has jurisdiction over the patent owner.