Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Arizona, State of v. Mayorkas et al
Case Number:
2:21-cv-00617
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Other Statutes: Environmental Matters
Judge:
Government Agencies
-
November 21, 2022
Ariz. Fights Feds' Bid To Have Border Suit Tossed
The state of Arizona has asked a federal judge to uphold its standing to challenge the Biden administration's immigration policies, arguing that the federal government's bid to have its suit dismissed doesn't even refute some of its claims.
-
September 22, 2022
Feds Ask Judge To Toss Arizona Border Wall Suit
The Biden administration has asked an Arizona federal judge, once again, to dismiss claims made by the Grand Canyon State blaming the president's immigration policies for an increase in its migrant population, arguing the state hasn't shown its claims are supported by anything more than correlation.
-
April 18, 2022
Judge Mulls Cutting Ariz.'s Suit Over Feds' Immigration Policy
A federal judge has signaled that he is prepared to pare down Arizona's environmental challenge to President Joe Biden's immigration policies that the state claims would increase its population, saying the state had no proof that the policies would spur illegal immigration.
-
March 18, 2022
Biden Fights Arizona Discovery Bid In Border Wall Suit
Arizona has no right to documents related to the Biden administration's decision to terminate construction of the border wall between Mexico and the U.S., the federal government told a judge Thursday.
-
February 08, 2022
Arizona's Immigration Agenda Suit Found Likely Untenable
An Arizona federal judge refused Arizona's request to block Biden administration actions it says are increasing the country's population, ruling that plaintiffs can't use federal environmental regulation to launch a wholesale challenge to the administration's immigration policies.
-
April 12, 2021
Ariz. AG Says Biden Border Wall Change Needs Enviro Review
Arizona's attorney general said Monday that he is suing the Biden administration over its move to halt construction of the southern border wall, arguing that the decision could increase the state's population and therefore required an environmental analysis that was not done.