Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Robert E. Hill, et al
Case Number:
5:21-cv-03216
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
November 09, 2023
Allen Matkins Escapes DQ From Land Contamination Suit
A California federal judge has rejected freight railway operator Union Pacific's attempt to disqualify Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP from its land contamination suit, ruling that there was no conflict of interest stemming from a previous environmental suit.
-
October 25, 2023
Union Pacific Says Atty's Status Requires Allen Matkins DQ
Freight rail operator Union Pacific urged a California federal judge to disqualify Allen Matkins attorneys representing the defendants in its environmental contamination lawsuit, arguing that a conflicted lawyer who purportedly retired has in fact remained at Allen Matkins so the firm must be taken off the case.
-
October 20, 2023
Allen Matkins Says Ex-Atty's Role Shouldn't DQ Firm
Allen Matkins has reiterated that a California federal court should not disqualify the firm from representing a pair of landowners in a suit from Union Pacific, arguing that a former attorney's role with the firm doesn't warrant disqualification and that there's no evidence confidential information was ever disclosed, as the freight operator contended could happen.
-
October 13, 2023
Calif. Landowners Want Out Of Land Contamination Suit
Two California landowners asked a federal court to release them from an environmental suit brought by Union Pacific, saying the railroad has no evidence that they ever used any environmental contaminant on a San Jose property.
-
September 14, 2023
Allen Matkins Fights Union Pacific's DQ Bid In Enviro Suit
A pair of California landowners being sued by Union Pacific asked a federal judge this week to reject its bid to disqualify their Allen Matkins attorneys over claims that they were exposed to confidential information from other lawyers who represented a corporate predecessor to Union Pacific decades ago.
-
September 08, 2023
Union Pacific Wants Attys Axed From Contamination Row
Freight rail operator Union Pacific asked a California federal judge this week to disqualify Allen Matkins attorneys representing the defendants in its contamination lawsuit, alleging that actions taken by their colleagues who previously represented the company exposed the lawyers to confidential information in violation of procedural law.