Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Guangzhou Yucheng Trading Co., Ltd. v. DBest Products, Inc.
Case Number:
2:21-cv-04758
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- California Consumer Attorneys
- Chora Young
- Davis Wright Tremaine
- Glacier Law LLP
- Orbit IP LLP
- RJ Ryan Law
- SML Avvocati
- Tarter Krinsky
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 03, 2023
Shopping Cart Co. Must Pay $2.2M In 'Egregious' Patent Case
A California federal judge has ordered a Chinese company that sold shopping carts through Amazon and Walmart to pay nearly $2.2 million in a patent case, permanently barred it from making future sales and called its conduct "egregious" and its defenses "frivolous."
-
June 22, 2023
IP Forecast: 2 Live Crew Seeks To Win Back Copyrights
A Florida federal judge will consider next week whether members of Miami hip-hop group 2 Live Crew can terminate their old record deal after a lawyer for their erstwhile label bought their copyrights in a bankruptcy proceeding. Here's a look at that case — plus all the other major intellectual property matters on deck in the coming week.
-
March 07, 2023
Grocery Cart Maker Nets Willfulness Win In Patent Trial
Handing a win to a shopping cart maker, a California federal jury has found that a Chinese company willfully infringed a patent covering one of its products and awarded the patent owner more than $463,000.