Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Wynn Resorts Limited v. Factory Mutual Insurance Company
Case Number:
2:21-cv-01230
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 04, 2022
Wynn Fights Insurer's Bid To Toss Virus Coverage Suit
Wynn Resorts has repudiated what it calls Factory Mutual Insurance Co.'s "latest tactic" to avoid paying the Las Vegas casino giant for its COVID-19-related losses, urging a Nevada federal court to deny the insurer's attempt to exit Wynn's coverage suit.
-
March 04, 2022
Wynn's COVID Loss Lacks Physical Damage, Insurer Says
Factory Mutual Insurance Co. told a Nevada federal court that Wynn Resorts failed to allege that COVID-19 caused physical loss or damage at its Las Vegas hotels and casinos in a bid for a partial victory in the coverage suit.
-
January 12, 2022
Wynn's Extensive Footnotes Don't Doom Virus Coverage
An insurer's attempt to toss Wynn Resorts' COVID-19 coverage lawsuit by arguing it had too many footnotes fell flat as a Nevada federal judge kept the case alive.
-
July 21, 2021
Wynn Accuses Insurer Of Stalling In 'Absurd' Footnote Fight
Wynn Resorts said Tuesday that its insurer's attempt to toss a COVID-19 lawsuit because it has too many footnotes is nothing more than a stall tactic, and the court should not grant the dismissal request over an "absurd" undue burden argument.