Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Cox v. CoinMarketCap OpCo LLC et al
Case Number:
3:21-cv-08197
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Other Statutes: Securities/Commodities
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Balestriere Fariello
- Davillier Law Group
- Goodwin Procter
- Hahn Loeser
- Morvillo Abramowitz
- Paul Weiss
- Sullivan & Cromwell
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 13, 2023
Binance Dodges Claims It 'Deflated' Token's Value, Rankings
An Arizona federal judge dismissed a proposed class action lawsuit accusing Binance.US of artificially deflating the price of HEX cryptocurrency by lowering its ranking on its exchange, ruling that the investor plaintiff didn't prove it had sufficient ties to the state.
-
December 14, 2021
Investor Can't Serve Crypto Execs Via Twitter, Court Says
A federal judge in Arizona on Tuesday denied a cryptocurrency investor's request to serve officers of crypto exchange Binance through Twitter, saying that while a private investigator was unable to locate their countries of residence, serving them on the social media site may violate international law.
-
September 15, 2021
Crypto Ranking Site Accused Of Manipulating Token Price
A cryptocurrency investor has hit digital asset ranking site CoinMarketCap with a lawsuit claiming the platform unfairly suppressed the ranking of an up-and-coming token that posed a competitive threat to its corporate owner.