Barnes et al v. 3 Rivers Telephone Cooperative, Inc.

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

4:21-cv-00118

Court:

Montana

Nature of Suit:

Civil Rights: Other

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Brian Morris

Firms

  1. July 17, 2023

    Telecom Inks $9M Settlement In Blackfeet Discrimination Suit

    A Montana telecommunications company has received final approval of its $9 million settlement deal resolving claims that it illegally withheld revenue from a group of Blackfeet Nation citizens, clearing the way for more than 1,800 people to ultimately get compensation.

  2. February 10, 2023

    Blackfeet Get Early OK Of $9M Settlement In Race-Bias Suit

    A federal judge in Montana gave his preliminary approval to a $9 million settlement that would end litigation in which Blackfeet Nation members said a telecommunications cooperative withheld the revenue from its 2020 sale of certain business assets due to their Native heritage.

  3. August 10, 2022

    Blackfeet Customers Keep Race Bias Claims Against Telecom

    A Montana federal judge has ruled that Native American customers can continue pursuing racial discrimination claims against a telecommunications cooperative, while he trimmed other claims that the co-op failed to pay the plaintiffs money they were owed when the co-op sold part of its business to a Blackfeet Nation-owned utility. 

  4. February 03, 2022

    Telecom Co-Op Asks To Nix Blackfeet Nation Race Bias Suit

    A telecommunications cooperative asked a Montana federal judge to toss all claims but one in a race discrimination suit by the Blackfeet Nation, which alleged it failed to pay tribal customers money they were owed when the co-op sold an exchange to a tribally owned utility.

  5. December 01, 2021

    Native Americans Say They Were Cheated By Local ISP

    When 3 Rivers Communications sold off a telephone and internet exchange that covered a Blackfeet reservation, the telecom's Native American customers were shuffled off to a new company and denied the money they were owed as member-owners, a new suit claims.