Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Contour IP Holding LLC v. GoPro, Inc.
Case Number:
22-1654
Court:
Nature of Suit:
-
November 14, 2024
Full Fed. Circ. Won't Touch GoPro Patent Eligibility Argument
The full Federal Circuit decided Thursday not to look further into arguments from GoPro Inc. that a September panel ruling on patents asserted against the camera company created "a breathtaking expansion of subject-matter eligibility."
-
September 09, 2024
Fed. Circ. Undoes Alice Ax Of Camera Patents In GoPro Case
The Federal Circuit on Monday reversed a decision invalidating two video camera patents that GoPro Inc. is accused of infringing, ruling that the patents cover technological improvements, and not only an abstract idea, as a California federal judge had ruled.
-
February 07, 2024
Fed. Circ. Panel Questions GoPro On Camera Patent Defense
A Federal Circuit panel on Wednesday told an attorney for GoPro that the company's argument in the ongoing camera patent suit was similar to an obviousness defense that had already failed years ago in front of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
-
August 18, 2022
Fed. Circ. Told Judge Wrongly Axed Camera IP In GoPro Case
Contour IP Holding LLC has urged the Federal Circuit to undo a finding that camera technology it accused GoPro Inc. of infringing wasn't protected by patent law, saying a lower court erred by ruling that the patents didn't cover patentable subject matter.