Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Morgan v. Twitter Inc

Track this case

Case Number:

2:22-cv-00122

Court:

Washington Eastern

Nature of Suit:

Civil Rights: Other

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Mary K. Dimke

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. January 13, 2026

    Wash. Officials Challenge 9th Circ.'s X Corp. Standing Ruling

    A group of current and former Washington state officials urged the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday to review a man's proposed class action accusing X Corp., formerly known as Twitter, of violating a state telephone privacy law, telling justices that allowing the Ninth Circuit's ruling in the case to stand would erode state sovereignty and potentially lead to a circuit split.

  2. April 30, 2025

    9th Circ. Won't Revive Phone Number Privacy Suit Against X

    The Ninth Circuit on Wednesday declined to revive a Washington resident's putative class action that accused Twitter Inc., now called X, of deceptively obtaining his phone number, saying in an unpublished opinion that a state law he leaned on prohibited the fraudulent collection of telephone records, "not numbers."

  3. February 11, 2025

    9th Circ. Doubts X Plaintiff Can Revive Phone Data Suit

    A Ninth Circuit panel on Tuesday questioned whether a lawsuit targeting social platform X could be revived and remanded to state court, with one judge suggesting circuit precedent established a privacy right that keeps the case in federal court, and another saying the lower court had "broad discretion" in deciding to dismiss the case.

  4. November 27, 2023

    Twitter Plaintiff Can't Point To Specific Privacy Promises

    A Washington federal judge has tossed a Twitter user's proposed class action accusing the social media giant of deceptively obtaining his phone number for targeted advertising, ruling the user failed to identify what specific privacy assurance the site made that led him to provide the contact information.