Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Johnson v. Russell Investment Management LLC
Case Number:
1:22-cv-21735
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Akerman LLP
- Barlow & Coughran
- Groom Law Group
- Milbank LLP
- Morgan & Morgan PA
- Nichols Kaster
- Ogletree Deakins
- Schroeter Goldmark
- Wenzel Fenton
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 27, 2026
11th Circ. Scrutinizes Royal Caribbean's Defeat Of 401(k) Suit
The Eleventh Circuit zeroed in Tuesday on whether a lower court had enough evidence to hand Royal Caribbean a pretrial win in a suit brought by cruise ship workers who alleged they lost 401(k) savings because of shoddy target-date investment funds.
-
November 18, 2025
Investment Co. Inks Deal To End Royal Caribbean 401(k) Fight
Russell Investments Trust Co. has agreed to pay $500,000 to resolve class action claims that it loaded Royal Caribbean's employee retirement plan with underperforming proprietary funds while serving as its investment manager, the plan participant leading the suit has told a Florida federal court.
-
January 31, 2025
Royal Caribbean Escapes 401(k) Mismanagement Suit
A Florida federal judge tossed a suit Friday claiming Royal Caribbean allowed an investment manager to load its $500 million retirement plan with underperforming proprietary funds, ruling the plan participant behind the class action failed to put forward proof of objective imprudence.