Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Deere & Company Repair Services Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
3:22-cv-50188
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Audet & Partners
- Butler Snow LLP
- Cafferty Clobes
- Cotchett Pitre
- Crosner Legal
- Dunbar Davis
- Emerson Firm
- Foote Mielke
- GableGotwals
- Glancy Prongay
- Gustafson Gluek
- Hall & Evans
- Hausfeld LLP
- Jones Day
- Latham & Watkins
- Levin Papantonio
- Lightfoot Franklin
- Mastando & Artrip
- Meyers & Flowers
- Milberg Coleman
- Nixon Peabody
- Pogust Goodhead
- Quinn Connor Weaver
- Reinhardt Wendorf
- Sharp Law LLP
- Spector Roseman
- Spiro Harrison
- Troutman
- Wallace Miller
- Wexler Boley
- Whatley Kallas
- Whiteside & Goldberg
- Whitfield Bryson
- Williams McCarthy
- Zimmerman Reed
- Zwerling Schachter
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 25, 2022
John Deere Users Say Repair Monopoly Creates A 'Nightmare'
John Deere restricts competition for farm equipment repairing services by withholding necessary tools from farmers and independent repair shops and forcing customers to use "expensive and inconvenient" John Deere affiliate dealerships, a proposed class has alleged, saying the company has created a "nightmare for many farmers."
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next →