Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Sig Sauer, Inc. v. Jeffrey S. Bagnell, Esq., LLC et al

  1. September 04, 2025

    No Atty Sanctions After Failed Redaction In Gunmaker Lawsuit

    A Connecticut federal judge has declined a gunmaker's bid to sanction a civil litigator who filed a document without proper redactions, finding that the error was inadvertent and did not meet the "high bar" necessary to run afoul of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

  2. July 31, 2025

    Conn. Atty Pins Failed Redaction On Tech In Gunmaker Suit

    A third party's ability to bypass redactions and view protected documents was due to a software issue, a Connecticut civil litigator has told a federal judge, urging the court not to authorize sanctions for what he said was a "good faith" effort at redacting filings amid his dueling lawsuits with gunmaker Sig Sauer.

  3. April 22, 2025

    Atty Says Sig Sauer Defamed Him In Pistol Safety Statement

    A Connecticut lawyer on Tuesday added to an ongoing legal battle with weapons manufacturer Sig Sauer Inc., filing a new lawsuit claiming the gunmaker referenced him in a March 7 press release suggesting trial attorneys made misrepresentations about gun safety.

  4. July 11, 2023

    Atty's Counterclaims Axed In Sig Sauer Defamation Suit

    A Connecticut federal judge on Tuesday rejected counterclaims accusing gun manufacturer Sig Sauer of defaming one of the attorneys heading several suits alleging that its P320 pistols fire on their own when it publicly accused him of deceiving the public with an animation purporting to show the defect.