Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Kominis v. Starbucks Corporation
Case Number:
1:22-cv-06673
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
September 18, 2023
Starbucks Can't Dodge Bulk Of Refreshers Fruit Suit
A New York federal judge won't let Starbucks Corp. throw out the majority of a lawsuit alleging that the company misled consumers about the fruit content in its Refreshers line of beverages, finding that the complaint is enough to show that reasonable purchasers of the drinks would believe they contain fruits that are not present.
-
August 05, 2022
Starbucks Fruit Drink Buyer's Suit Asks, Where's The Fruit?
Starbucks markets its Refresher line of beverages as containing juice from tropical fruits like mango, passionfruit and acai, but the coffee company's fruity concoctions don't actually contain those fruits, according to a lawsuit filed Friday in New York federal court.