Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Wallrich et al v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al
Case Number:
1:22-cv-05506
Court:
Nature of Suit:
896(Other Statutes: Arbitration)
Judge:
Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
September 13, 2023
Samsung, 'Hoist With Its Own Petard,' Must Pay $4M Arb. Fees
An Illinois federal judge ordered Samsung on Tuesday to pay $4 million in individual arbitration fees on behalf of 35,651 customers alleging it illegally collected biometric data, writing "Samsung was surely thinking about money" when it wrote its arbitration agreement and alluding to William Shakespeare, saying Samsung was "hoist with its own petard."
-
December 06, 2022
Samsung Says Law Firm Seeks To 'Bury' It In Arbitration Fees
Samsung told an Illinois federal judge Monday that Labaton Sucharow LLP has made an "aggressive threat to bury Samsung under the weight of hundreds of millions of dollars in arbitration fees absent payment to them" after individual arbitration claims were filed against it on behalf of nearly 50,000 Samsung Galaxy device users over alleged unlawful collection of their biometric data.
-
October 11, 2022
Samsung Users Press 50K Arbitration Face Scan Claims
Samsung Electronics America Inc. is refusing to pay its share for arbitration proceedings that the electronics company mandates and that nearly 50,000 mobile device users are separately pursuing over the company's allegedly unlawful collection of their biometric data, according to a petition filed in Illinois federal court.