Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Bonny Schippell v. Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc.
Case Number:
5:23-cv-00410
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 09, 2023
J&J Beats False 'Baby' Sunscreen Label Suit, For Now
A California federal judge has tossed a proposed class action accusing Johnson & Johnson of misleading consumers by labeling some sunscreens as "baby" products, ruling that while the company's arguments on the merits of most of the claims are unpersuasive, the complaint falls short of adequately alleging consumers overpaid.
-
June 13, 2023
Sunscreen Buyers Push To Keep 'Baby' False Ad Suit Alive
A proposed class of sunscreen buyers is asking a California federal court not to dismiss their claims that Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. misled them by labeling some sunscreens and lotions with the word "baby," saying reasonable consumers would understand that to mean it is made specifically for babies, not just suitable for them.
-
May 10, 2023
J&J Says Customer's False Ad Suit Misinterprets 'Baby' Label
Johnson & Johnson is urging a California federal judge to toss a proposed class action alleging the word "baby" on sunscreen and lotion products is misleading since they contain the same ingredients as adult versions of the products, saying the consumer misconstrues the meaning of the word.
-
March 10, 2023
Aveeno Baby Lotion Is Same As Adult Lotion, Suit Says
Johnson & Johnson was hit with a suit alleging its uses the word "baby" on certain sunscreen and lotion products, misleading consumers to believe they are specially made for infants when, in fact, they contain ingredients identical to the adult versions of the same products.