Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Monster Energy Company v. Beast Cookie Company LLC
Case Number:
5:23-cv-00568
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
-
February 23, 2024
Monster Energy Ends Trade Dress Suit Against Beast Cookie
Monster Energy dropped its trademark and trade dress infringement action alleging Beast Cookie used confusingly similar branding to advertise its caffeinated cookies, including a green color scheme and the phrase "untamed energy," according to an order signed by a California federal judge granting the parties' stipulation to end their dispute.
-
June 16, 2023
Cookie Co. Must Face Monster Energy's Trade Dress Suit
A California federal judge wasn't persuaded he should toss Monster Energy's trademark suit against an energy cookie company over purportedly confusing branding, ruling that the suit is strong enough to survive dismissal despite "clear dissimilarities" in the competing brands' trade dresses.