Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Copeland et al v. Energizer Holdings, Inc. et al
Case Number:
5:23-cv-02087
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Berger Montague
- Cohen Milstein
- Gibbs Mura
- Gibson Dunn
- Latham & Watkins
- McCracken Stemerman
- Schneider Wallace
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 12, 2024
Energizer, Walmart Can't Ditch Battery Pricing Collusion Suits
Energizer and Walmart cannot escape a trio of class actions accusing the battery manufacturer of giving the big box chain almost complete control over the retail price its batteries are sold for and forbidding other retailers from undercutting them.
-
October 27, 2023
Walmart Rips 'Implausible' Battery Pricing Collusion Claims
Walmart and Energizer have fired back at a trio of class action complaints, telling a San Jose federal court that the suits are built upon baseless and "implausible" inferences and that the plaintiffs' opposition to the companies' dismissal motions rely on un-pled assertions.