March 06, 2026
A Florida federal court denied President Donald Trump's social media company's bid to prevent The Washington Post from asking Trump Media corporate representatives about the company's financial information, finding it is relevant in the $2.78 billion defamation suit against the newspaper.
March 03, 2026
A former executive of Truth Social's parent company told a North Carolina federal court Monday that Trump Media's last-minute bid to depose him in its high-profile defamation lawsuit against The Washington Post is actually a tactic to avoid sanctions in an unrelated lawsuit against him and other major media outlets.
June 06, 2025
The Washington Post must face Trump Media & Technology Group's suit over an article accusing it of committing securities fraud over a purported finder's fee paid to Entoro Securities to secure a loan, a Florida federal judge said Friday, ruling Trump Media's latest pleading "squarely alleges" no fee agreement existed.
February 19, 2025
Trump Media & Technology Group Corp. has told a Florida federal court that the Washington Post can't blame a source for providing false information published in a story alleging the company committed securities fraud, saying that reason isn't sufficient to dismiss a $3.8 billion defamation lawsuit against the newspaper.
March 08, 2024
A Florida federal judge on Friday tossed a $3.8 billion defamation lawsuit by former President Donald Trump's social media startup but gave the company another shot at supporting its claims that the Washington Post acted with malice in its reporting accusing the startup of securities fraud.
July 18, 2023
The Washington Post urged a Florida federal judge to toss a $3.8 billion defamation lawsuit by former President Donald Trump's social media startup, arguing that the startup has failed to show that the newspaper acted with malice in its reporting.
July 11, 2023
The Washington Post has urged a Florida federal judge to remove to federal court a $3.8 billion defamation lawsuit by former President Donald Trump's social media startup, arguing "complete diversity exists" between the two sides because of where they are each based, while the amount in controversy far exceeds $75,000.