Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. et al v. Tanase
Case Number:
3:23-cv-00448
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 17, 2025
Judge Grants Reduced Atty Award in Bowling Alley Chain Suit
A Virginia federal judge trimmed just over $150,000 in attorney fees requested by a bowling alley chain after winning summary judgment in a suit against its former chief information officer, whom it accused of hacking into its computer system and CEO's email.
-
December 13, 2024
Virginia Judge Will Rethink Atty Award Amount In Bowling Suit
A Virginia federal judge has agreed to reconsider a requested $3.2 million attorney fee award to a bowling alley chain in its suit claiming that the company's former chief information officer hacked into its CEO's email, finding that a state law doesn't explicitly permit attorney fees.
-
August 05, 2024
Former Bowling Exec Asks For Denial Of Attorney Fee Award
A former bowling company executive who last month ridiculed the size of the requested attorney fee award in a suit by his ex-employer told a Virginia federal judge this weekend that he should not have to pay the fees at all.
-
July 15, 2024
Former Exec Slams Bowling Co.'s 'Elitist' $3.7M Atty Fee Bid
The owners of the AMF and Lucky Strike bowling chains are not entitled to more than $3 million in attorney fees after winning a lawsuit, the target of the suit told a Virginia federal court while characterizing the owners as "bullies."
-
July 03, 2024
Bowling Co. Seeks $3.6M In Atty Fees From Former Exec
One of the world's largest bowling operations asked a Virginia federal judge to award $3.6 million in legal fees stemming from a lawsuit that accuses the company's former chief information officer of repeatedly hacking into its CEO's email.