Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Prakash
Case Number:
5:23-cv-03300
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 26, 2024
Ex-Glass Co. CFO Can't Beat SEC's Accounting Fraud Suit
A California federal judge said Monday that a former officer of a "smart" glassmaker will have to face the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's allegations that he defrauded investors by failing to tell them about certain liabilities the company faced before it merged with a blank-check company.
-
October 11, 2023
SEC Says Ex-Glass Co. CFO Must Face SPAC Deal Suit
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has urged a California federal judge not to toss its suit against a former executive at a "smart" glass-maker who allegedly failed to tell investors about certain liabilities the company faced before its merger with a blank-check company, saying the executive's dismissal bid is "premature and legally unsupported."
-
September 06, 2023
Ex-Glass Co. CFO Looks To Shatter SEC Suit Over SPAC Deal
A former executive at a "smart" glass-maker has urged a judge to toss the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's suit alleging he failed to tell investors about certain liabilities the company faced before it merged with a blank-check company, arguing none of the agency's claims impose strict liability on executives for accounting errors.