Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Scharpf, et al. v. General Dynamics Corp., et al.
Case Number:
1:23-cv-01372
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- A&O Shearman
- Berger Montague
- Blank Rome
- Cohen Milstein
- Crowell & Moring
- Davis Wright Tremaine
- Godfrey & Kahn
- Greenberg Traurig
- Hagens Berman
- Handley Farah
- Jenner & Block
- Lockridge Grindal
- McGuireWoods
- Nixon Peabody
- Paul Hastings
- Pillsbury Winthrop
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
- Wiley Rein
- WilmerHale
Companies
- Bollinger Shipyards Inc.
- CACI International Inc.
- General Dynamics Corp.
- Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
-
September 16, 2025
Maritime Recruiter Settles Naval Engineers' No-Poach Claims
A maritime jobs recruitment company has settled claims it participated in an illegal no-poach conspiracy to suppress wages among some of the country's biggest warship makers and naval engineering consultants, court records show.
-
August 26, 2025
Shipbuilders Push To Escape Revived No-Poach Claims
A Fourth Circuit decision that revived a proposed class action accusing some of the country's biggest warship makers and naval engineering consultants of participating in an illegal no-poach conspiracy to suppress wages leaves a Virginia federal judge free to dismiss the case, according to the companies.
-
July 24, 2025
Naval Engineers In No-Poach Suit Hint At New Named Plaintiff
A proposed class of naval engineers suing the nation's major military shipbuilders and contractors over an alleged no-poach wage-fixing scheme may have a new named plaintiff to bring to the case.
-
May 21, 2024
Ship Engineers Take Case Against Shipbuilders To 4th Circ.
A pair of naval engineers are challenging a Virginia federal judge's decision to toss their proposed class action accusing a collection of shipbuilding military contractors of entering into secret "no-poach" agreements, asking the Fourth Circuit to take up their appeal in a new filing.
-
April 22, 2024
Court Tosses Shipbuilders No-Poach Case As Untimely
A Virginia federal court found that a pair of warship designers haven't shown that major shipbuilders for the U.S. military, including General Dynamics and Huntington Ingalls Industries, concealed a "gentlemen's agreement" to not poach workers from one another.
-
October 10, 2023
Shipbuilders Accused Of No-Poach 'Gentlemen's Agreement'
A pair of former warship designers filed a proposed class action in Virginia federal court against two major shipbuilders for the U.S. military, General Dynamics and Huntington Ingalls Industries, and other companies allegedly involved in a decades-long conspiracy to suppress their wages through a no-poach "gentlemen's agreement."