Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Scharpf, et al. v. General Dynamics Corp., et al.
Case Number:
1:23-cv-01372
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- A&O Shearman
- Berger Montague
- Blank Rome
- Cohen Milstein
- Crowell & Moring
- Davis Wright Tremaine
- Godfrey & Kahn
- Greenberg Traurig
- Hagens Berman
- Handley Farah
- Jenner & Block
- JPS Law
- Lockridge Grindal
- McGuireWoods
- Nixon Peabody
- Paul Hastings
- Pillsbury Winthrop
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
- Wiley Rein
- WilmerHale
Companies
- Bollinger Shipyards Inc.
- CACI International Inc.
- General Dynamics Corp.
- Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 28, 2025
Engineer Must Give Shipbuilders No-Poach Witness Names
A Virginia federal magistrate judge ordered a naval engineer to name all the witnesses her attorneys spoke to, and all the information about those interviews, as the nation's largest military shipbuilders seek to argue she's too late to accuse them of agreeing not to poach each other's workers.
-
October 23, 2025
Shipbuilders' Discovery Demands Go Too Far, Engineer Says
One of the naval engineers suing the nation's largest military shipbuilders over an alleged no-poach agreement said she's already identified 20 witnesses and produced more than 3,000 pages of documents in discovery, but the companies are still asking for attorney work product in their latest demands.
-
September 16, 2025
Maritime Recruiter Settles Naval Engineers' No-Poach Claims
A maritime jobs recruitment company has settled claims it participated in an illegal no-poach conspiracy to suppress wages among some of the country's biggest warship makers and naval engineering consultants, court records show.
-
August 26, 2025
Shipbuilders Push To Escape Revived No-Poach Claims
A Fourth Circuit decision that revived a proposed class action accusing some of the country's biggest warship makers and naval engineering consultants of participating in an illegal no-poach conspiracy to suppress wages leaves a Virginia federal judge free to dismiss the case, according to the companies.
-
July 24, 2025
Naval Engineers In No-Poach Suit Hint At New Named Plaintiff
A proposed class of naval engineers suing the nation's major military shipbuilders and contractors over an alleged no-poach wage-fixing scheme may have a new named plaintiff to bring to the case.
-
May 21, 2024
Ship Engineers Take Case Against Shipbuilders To 4th Circ.
A pair of naval engineers are challenging a Virginia federal judge's decision to toss their proposed class action accusing a collection of shipbuilding military contractors of entering into secret "no-poach" agreements, asking the Fourth Circuit to take up their appeal in a new filing.
-
April 22, 2024
Court Tosses Shipbuilders No-Poach Case As Untimely
A Virginia federal court found that a pair of warship designers haven't shown that major shipbuilders for the U.S. military, including General Dynamics and Huntington Ingalls Industries, concealed a "gentlemen's agreement" to not poach workers from one another.
-
October 10, 2023
Shipbuilders Accused Of No-Poach 'Gentlemen's Agreement'
A pair of former warship designers filed a proposed class action in Virginia federal court against two major shipbuilders for the U.S. military, General Dynamics and Huntington Ingalls Industries, and other companies allegedly involved in a decades-long conspiracy to suppress their wages through a no-poach "gentlemen's agreement."