Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Scharpf, et al. v. General Dynamics Corp., et al.
Case Number:
1:23-cv-01372
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- A&O Shearman
- Bean Kinney
- Berger Montague
- Blank Rome
- Cohen Milstein
- Crowell & Moring
- Davis Wright Tremaine
- Godfrey & Kahn
- Greenberg Traurig
- Hagens Berman
- Handley Farah
- Jenner & Block
- JPS Law
- Lockridge Grindal
- McGuireWoods
- Nixon Peabody
- Paul Hastings
- Pillsbury Winthrop
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
- Wiley Rein
- WilmerHale
Companies
- Bollinger Shipyards Inc.
- CACI International Inc.
- General Dynamics Corp.
- Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
-
March 18, 2026
Shipbuilders Cut Deals To End No-Poach Claims
Affiliates of Huntington Ingalls, Marinette Marine and Serco have reached settlements resolving the claims against them in a case accusing some of the country's biggest shipbuilders of conspiring to suppress naval architect and engineer wages.
-
March 13, 2026
Shipbuilders Oppose New Plaintiff For Wage Suppression Suit
Some of the country's biggest shipbuilders accused of conspiring to suppress naval architect and engineer wages told a Virginia federal judge a proposed class waited too long to add a new named plaintiff who worked in the industry more recently.
-
January 05, 2026
Naval Architecture Firm Resolves Engineers' No-Poach Claims
A naval architecture and marine engineering firm has settled claims it participated in an illegal conspiracy to suppress wages alongside some of the country's biggest warship makers, according to recent federal court filings.
-
December 12, 2025
Shipbuilders, Naval Engineer Spar Over Witness Statements
Shipbuilders and design consultants accused of illegally conspiring to suppress industry wages are clashing with a former naval engineer over what various witnesses told her in support of her proposed class action against the companies.
-
December 01, 2025
Shipbuilders Can't Escape Revived No-Poach Claims
A Virginia federal court has refused to toss a proposed class action accusing some of the country's biggest warship makers and naval engineering consultants of participating in an illegal conspiracy to suppress wages after the Fourth Circuit revived the case earlier this year.
-
October 28, 2025
Engineer Must Give Shipbuilders No-Poach Witness Names
A Virginia federal magistrate judge ordered a naval engineer to name all the witnesses her attorneys spoke to, and all the information about those interviews, as the nation's largest military shipbuilders seek to argue she's too late to accuse them of agreeing not to poach each other's workers.
-
October 23, 2025
Shipbuilders' Discovery Demands Go Too Far, Engineer Says
One of the naval engineers suing the nation's largest military shipbuilders over an alleged no-poach agreement said she's already identified 20 witnesses and produced more than 3,000 pages of documents in discovery, but the companies are still asking for attorney work product in their latest demands.
-
September 16, 2025
Maritime Recruiter Settles Naval Engineers' No-Poach Claims
A maritime jobs recruitment company has settled claims it participated in an illegal no-poach conspiracy to suppress wages among some of the country's biggest warship makers and naval engineering consultants, court records show.
-
August 26, 2025
Shipbuilders Push To Escape Revived No-Poach Claims
A Fourth Circuit decision that revived a proposed class action accusing some of the country's biggest warship makers and naval engineering consultants of participating in an illegal no-poach conspiracy to suppress wages leaves a Virginia federal judge free to dismiss the case, according to the companies.
-
July 24, 2025
Naval Engineers In No-Poach Suit Hint At New Named Plaintiff
A proposed class of naval engineers suing the nation's major military shipbuilders and contractors over an alleged no-poach wage-fixing scheme may have a new named plaintiff to bring to the case.