Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Francisco Roldan, III et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
Case Number:
2:24-cv-00136
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 21, 2024
BofA Gag Clause Suit Heads For 9th Circ. After 2nd Dismissal
A group of consumers who sued Bank of America for allegedly using improper nondisparagement clauses in its online service agreements moved Tuesday to take their case to the Ninth Circuit after a California federal judge threw it out for a second time last month.
-
February 22, 2024
BofA Pulling Fast One To Exit Gag Clause Suit, Customers Say
Consumers suing Bank of America for allegedly trying to stifle consumer critics through clauses in its online service agreements have urged a California federal judge not to toss their suit, arguing the bank's dismissal arguments are without legal merit, factually incorrect and "intended to mislead."
-
January 16, 2024
BofA Denies 'Silencing' Criticism In User Agreements
Bank of America NA has denied allegations that it "stifles" consumer critics through nondisparagement clauses in its online banking terms and conditions, saying the terms targeted by a recent proposed class action are actually designed to prevent the use of online banking services for conduct like terrorist financing, fraud and harassment.
-
January 08, 2024
BofA Sued In Calif. Over User Agreements That 'Stifle' Critics
A proposed class action removed to California federal court on Friday accuses Bank of America NA of unlawfully attempting to silence unhappy customers by embedding non-disparagement clauses in its online banking terms and conditions.