Francisco Roldan, III et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

2:24-cv-00136

Court:

California Central

Nature of Suit:

Contract: Other

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Sherilyn Peace Garnett

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. August 21, 2024

    BofA Gag Clause Suit Heads For 9th Circ. After 2nd Dismissal

    A group of consumers who sued Bank of America for allegedly using improper nondisparagement clauses in its online service agreements moved Tuesday to take their case to the Ninth Circuit after a California federal judge threw it out for a second time last month.

  2. February 22, 2024

    BofA Pulling Fast One To Exit Gag Clause Suit, Customers Say

    Consumers suing Bank of America for allegedly trying to stifle consumer critics through clauses in its online service agreements have urged a California federal judge not to toss their suit, arguing the bank's dismissal arguments are without legal merit, factually incorrect and "intended to mislead."

  3. January 16, 2024

    BofA Denies 'Silencing' Criticism In User Agreements

    Bank of America NA has denied allegations that it "stifles" consumer critics through nondisparagement clauses in its online banking terms and conditions, saying the terms targeted by a recent proposed class action are actually designed to prevent the use of online banking services for conduct like terrorist financing, fraud and harassment.

  4. January 08, 2024

    BofA Sued In Calif. Over User Agreements That 'Stifle' Critics

    A proposed class action removed to California federal court on Friday accuses Bank of America NA of unlawfully attempting to silence unhappy customers by embedding non-disparagement clauses in its online banking terms and conditions.