Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Ducere, LLC v. Enbridge (U.S.) Inc. et al
Case Number:
1:24-cv-01217
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
-
May 24, 2024
Enbridge Says Oil Transport Monopoly Claims Lack Merit
Enbridge Inc. fired back at an antitrust suit accusing it of intentionally killing a pipeline terminal project that would have resulted in the company losing its monopoly power over crude oil transportation in the Chicago area, calling for an Illinois federal judge to dismiss the claims.
-
February 13, 2024
Enbridge, ExxonMobil Accused Of Monopolizing Oil Transport
Enbridge and ExxonMobil were hit with an antitrust suit in Illinois federal court Tuesday accusing them of working together to deny others access to crude oil pipelines, pulling the plug on a new way to transport oil from the Chicago area after a company invested $11 million.