Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Segal v. Amadeus IT Group, S.A. et al
Case Number:
1:24-cv-01783
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Actuate Law
- Davis Polk
- Gibson Dunn
- Jenner & Block
- King & Spalding
- Korein Tillery
- Lowey Dannenberg
- McGuireWoods
- McKool Smith
- Norton Rose
- Paul Weiss
- Robins Kaplan
- Sidley Austin
- Skadden Arps
- White & Case
Companies
- Accor SA
- Amadeus IT Group SA
- Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
- Hyatt Hotels Corp.
- InterContinental Hotels Group PLC
- Loews Corp.
- Loews Hotels & Co.
- Marriott International Inc.
- Omni Hotels Corp.
- Starwood Hotel & Resorts Worldwide Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 29, 2025
Guests Defend Luxury Hotel Info Exchange Claims
Guests targeting luxury hotel chains for using software provided by Amadeus IT Group to exchange occupancy information told an Illinois federal court the chains have used the software platform to raise room rates in local areas across the country.
-
June 13, 2025
Luxury Hotels Reject Latest Room Rate-Fixing Claims
Hotel chains and their "benchmarking" software provider are telling an Illinois federal judge that the latest version of a proposed price-fixing class action is no better than the one that got dismissed in March, and that the plaintiff still hasn't alleged that the hotel groups ever communicated with each other.