Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Starbucks Corporation v. NLRB
Case Number:
24-1585
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Companies
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 17, 2025
8th Circ. Says NLRB Misapplied Standard In Starbucks Case
The National Labor Relations Board improperly ignored a Starbucks employee's impression of her manager's comments during a union campaign when concluding the comments were unlawful, a split Eighth Circuit panel ruled Tuesday, resolving a case that challenged the board's standard for determining when an employer's anti-union rhetoric violates labor law.
-
October 17, 2024
Starbucks Can't Disturb Threat Standard, NLRB Tells 8th Circ.
The Eighth Circuit should reject Starbucks' "groundless" challenge to the well-established standard for determining when employers' statements constitute unlawful threats, the National Labor Relations Board has argued, asking the court to enforce the board's holding that a store manager threatened unionizing workers by saying they might not get raises.
-
August 07, 2024
Starbucks Fights 'Speech-Censoring' NLRB Order At 8th Circ.
The National Labor Relations Board used a "speech-censoring standard" to find a Los Angeles store manager made unlawful comments to a worker about unionization, Starbucks argued to the Eighth Circuit, saying the agency didn't consider evidence about whether employees felt threatened.