Montgomery v. Seminole Hard Rock Digital, LLC

Track this case

Case Number:

8:24-cv-01062

Court:

Florida Middle

Nature of Suit:

Other Fraud

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Kathryn Kimball Mizelle

Firms

Government Agencies

  1. March 13, 2025

    Seminole Say Minn. Order Backs Bid To Nix Gaming Ad Suit

    The Seminole Tribe of Florida says a recent federal court order that dismissed a Minnesota casino and horse racetrack operator's claims that tribal entities' Class III gaming operations are illegal supports its bid to nix a proposed class action over allegedly misleading advertisements by its Hard Rock Digital gaming vendor.

  2. February 10, 2025

    Fla. Court Lets Seminoles Intervene In Gaming Ad Suit

    A Florida federal judge on Monday granted the Seminole Tribe of Florida's request to intervene in a proposed class action over allegedly misleading advertisements by gaming vendor Seminole Hard Rock Digital, which the judge found cannot adequately represent the tribe's interests.

  3. December 11, 2024

    Seminole Tribe Can't Intervene In Gaming Ad Suit, Court Told

    A class action party is objecting to the Seminole Tribe of Florida's proposed intervention in the lawsuit, saying the tribe's interests are adequately protected by vendor Seminole Hard Rock Digital, which has already raised the tribe's defenses in successive motions to dismiss.

  4. October 25, 2024

    Seminole Tribe Looks To Dismiss Gaming Ad Suit

    The Seminole Tribe of Florida asked a Florida federal court to dismiss a proposed class suit claiming ads from the tribe's gaming vendor are misleading, arguing that the suit cannot continue without the tribe as a party, but the tribe cannot be added as a party because of sovereign immunity.

  5. October 07, 2024

    Tribe's 'No Regret' Gaming Ads Misleading, Fla. Residents Say

    Ads from the gaming vendor of the Seminole Tribe of Florida promising to give bettors as much as $100 back if they lose their first wager is false, deceptive, misleading and unfair marketing that violates state law, despite the tribe's claims of sovereign immunity, according to an updated proposed class action in federal court.