Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
HIMES v. FIVE BELOW, INC. et al
Case Number:
2:24-cv-03638
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Other Statutes: Securities/Commodities
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Ballard Spahr
- Berger Montague
- Bernstein Litowitz
- Bielli & Klauder
- Glancy Prongay
- Levi & Korsinsky
- Pomerantz LLP
- Troutman
Companies
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 26, 2025
Five Below Beats Some Investor Claims On Growth Potential
A Pennsylvania federal judge has trimmed some claims from a shareholder suit accusing discount retailer Five Below and its executives of overstating the company's growth prospects and its ability to curb inventory loss, finding some of the suit's challenged statements to be inactionable, among other things.
-
October 29, 2024
2 Firms Tapped To Lead Five Below Investor Suit
Berger Montague PC and Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP will represent a proposed class of investors in a suit alleging that teen-focused retail chain Five Below overstated its growth prospects, then saw trading prices crater when it announced that its sales expectations fell short.
-
August 02, 2024
Five Below Hit With Investor Suit Over Growth Potential
Discount retail chain Five Below has been sued by investors claiming its executives misled investors about the growth potential of its stores, causing stock prices to tumble.