Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Amazon.com Services LLC et al v. National Labor Relations Board et al
Case Number:
2:24-cv-09564
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 01, 2025
Union Says Wilcox Ruling Invalidates Amazon Injunction Bid
Amazon's Constitution-based bid to block a National Labor Relations Board case cannot stand now that the company's argument has been rejected in Washington, D.C., federal court, a Teamsters unit told a California federal judge, pointing to the recent D.C. ruling that board members' job protections are constitutional.
-
February 21, 2025
Teamsters Unit Fights Amazon's New Bid To Block NLRB Case
Amazon doesn't deserve an injunction blocking a National Labor Relations Board hearing any more now than it did two weeks ago, a Teamsters unit argued, asking a California judge to toss the company's renewed bid to escape a hearing on claims that it illegally snubbed a delivery drivers union.
-
February 06, 2025
Amazon Must Face NLRB Hearing Over Delivery Drivers Union
Amazon cannot block a National Labor Relations Board hearing at which it will face allegations of snubbing its delivery drivers' union, a California federal judge has ruled, holding that the e-commerce giant cannot skirt the broad ban on labor-dispute injunctions imposed by the Norris-LaGuardia Act.
-
December 02, 2024
NLRB Fights Amazon's Bid To Stop Case Alleging Union Snub
A California federal judge should let National Labor Relations Board prosecutors keep pursuing an administrative case that accuses Amazon of illegally snubbing a drivers union, the prosecutors argued, urging the court to reject Amazon's attempt to block the case on constitutional grounds.
-
November 06, 2024
Amazon Calls For Halt To NLRB Delivery Drivers Proceeding
Amazon urged a California federal judge to pause a National Labor Relations Board case alleging the e-commerce giant jointly employed its former contractor's Teamster-represented drivers, raising now-familiar claims that removal protections for agency officials violate the U.S. Constitution.