Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
In re Closed Cannabis Oil Vaporizer Systems and Components Indirect Purchaser Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
3:24-cv-09090
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Baker Botts
- Bryson Harris Suciu & DeMay
- Clarkson Law Firm PC
- Ferraro Law Firm
- Foley & Lardner
- Leeds Brown
- Quinn Emanuel
- Steven Williams Law
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 07, 2025
Marijuana Vape Antitrust Actions Consolidated In Calif.
Five proposed antitrust class actions brought by buyers of CCell brand cannabis vape accusing the Chinese manufacturers and U.S. distributors of organizing a price-fixing scheme will be consolidated in California federal court, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation has determined.
-
August 11, 2025
Consumers Say Vape Makers Can't Escape Price-Fixing Suit
Buyers of cannabis vape brand CCell are pushing back on two bids seeking to dismiss their consolidated proposed consumer class action in California federal court accusing the Chinese manufacturers and U.S. distributors of organizing a price-fixing scheme, saying the companies' interpretation of antitrust law creates a legal loophole.
-
August 01, 2025
Manufacturer Seeks To Toss Marijuana Vape Antitrust Suit
The Chinese companies behind cannabis vape brand CCell have urged a California federal court to dismiss a consolidated consumer class action accusing it of orchestrating a price-fixing scheme, accusing the buyers of "padding" their amended complaint with "copy-pasted" passages from other, unrelated lawsuits.