Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
STOW et al v. ACTIVEHOURS, INC.
Case Number:
1:25-cv-00391
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
-
October 23, 2025
Lending App EarnIn Users Must Arbitrate NC Class Claims
Users of payday loan app EarnIn must arbitrate claims that the company's cash advance product violates North Carolina's consumer protection laws, a federal judge ruled, finding that the users clearly agreed to arbitration when they signed up for the app.
-
May 19, 2025
Lending App EarnIn Hit With Consumer Class Action In NC
Pay day loan app EarnIn has been hit with a proposed class action in North Carolina alleging its cash advance product violates state consumer protection laws by distributing cash advances without a license and dupes consumers into paying unnecessary fees.