UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. SIMON & SIMON P.C. et al

  1. September 03, 2026

    Philly Firm Says Recent Discovery Dooms Uber's RICO Suit

    Philadelphia personal injury firm Simon & Simon PC has asked a Pennsylvania federal judge to dismiss Uber's complaint accusing it of orchestrating a fraudulent scheme to inflate settlements, claiming it learned through discovery that the company has not been damaged by the payouts.

  2. August 27, 2026

    Uber Beats Defamation Claims In Philly RICO Fight

    A Pennsylvania federal judge on Thursday tossed Philadelphia personal injury firm Simon & Simon PC's counterclaim accusing Uber and FedEx of sham litigation, extortion and abuse of process in response to the companies' ongoing RICO lawsuit against the firm.

  3. August 17, 2026

    Simon & Simon Gets Some Loss Records In Uber, FedEx Suit

    A federal judge has partially granted Philadelphia injury firm Simon & Simon PC's request to order Uber and FedEx to submit records showing alleged financial losses in connection with a Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations lawsuit accusing the firm of scheming to falsify medical records to boost injury claims against the companies.

  4. August 13, 2026

    Simon & Simon Seeks Loss Records In Uber, FedEx Suit

    Philadelphia injury firm Simon & Simon PC has asked a federal judge to order Uber and FedEx to submit records showing alleged financial losses in their Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organizations lawsuit accusing the firm of scheming to falsify medical records to boost injury claims against the companies.

  5. August 10, 2026

    Simon & Simon Can Shield Some Info In Uber, FedEx Suit

    A Pennsylvania federal judge has ruled that Simon & Simon PC can redact the identities of certain personal injury claimants and compensation paid to referral attorneys as it defends claims lodged by Uber and FedEx accusing the firm of a medical records falsification scheme meant to boost injury claims.

  6. July 21, 2026

    Judge Wary Of Philly Firm's Uber, FedEx Antitrust Claims

    A Pennsylvania federal judge on Tuesday appeared doubtful that Uber and FedEx engaged in anticompetitive conduct when they accused Philadelphia injury firm Simon & Simon of a medical records falsification scheme meant to boost injury claims, pointing out during a hearing that the companies and the firm operated different types of businesses.

  7. July 14, 2026

    Pa. Law Firm Defends 'Sham' Counterclaims In Uber RICO Suit

    Philadelphia-based personal injury firm Simon & Simon PC is defending its counterclaims against Uber and FedEx, arguing in Pennsylvania federal court that the rideshare and delivery companies contradicted their arguments regarding the validity of sham litigation claims in non-antitrust cases.

  8. June 30, 2026

    Uber, FedEx Slam Pa. Law Firm Counterclaims In RICO Suit

    Philadelphia-based personal injury firm Simon & Simon PC and its founder have failed to support a counterclaim in Pennsylvania federal court saying Uber Technologies Inc. and FedEx Corp. filed a sham litigation and abused the legal process with their ongoing RICO complaint against the firm, the companies argued Monday.

  9. June 09, 2026

    Pa. Law Firm Calls Uber and FedEx's RICO Suit A 'Sham'

    Nearly a month after its motion to dismiss a RICO suit filed by Uber and FedEx was denied by a Philadelphia federal judge, personal injury firm Simon & Simon PC has lodged a counterclaim against the companies, saying their complaint is a "frivolous sham."

  10. May 11, 2026

    Pa. Law Firm, Doctors Can't Shake Uber, FedEx RICO Suit

    A Pennsylvania federal judge said Monday that Uber and FedEx offered extensive and detailed allegations to press ahead with their racketeering lawsuit accusing a Philadelphia personal injury firm and local healthcare providers of scheming to fabricate medical records to inflate accident claims.