Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
In Re: CCell Closed Cannabis Oil Vaporization Systems and Components Products Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
3:25-md-03161
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Bryson Harris Suciu & DeMay
- Ferraro Law Firm
- Foley & Lardner
- Grabar Law
- Gustafson Gluek
- Hausfeld LLP
- Kopelowitz Ostrow
- Leeds Brown
- Milberg PLLC
- Quinn Emanuel
- Steven Williams Law
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 23, 2026
Vape Makers, Distributors Want Antitrust Claims Tossed
A group of vape manufacturers and distributors are asking a California federal judge to throw out consumers' claims in antitrust multidistrict litigation, saying the allegations fail to establish either standing or the existence of a price-fixing conspiracy.
-
October 07, 2025
Marijuana Vape Antitrust Actions Consolidated In Calif.
Five proposed antitrust class actions brought by buyers of CCell brand cannabis vape accusing the Chinese manufacturers and U.S. distributors of organizing a price-fixing scheme will be consolidated in California federal court, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation has determined.