USA v. State of Connecticut et al

  1. August 18, 2026

    Conn. Pans DOJ's Injury Claims In Use-Of-Force Law Dispute

    The state of Connecticut has challenged the U.S. Department of Justice's attempt to invalidate recent laws on use of force, identification and face covering that two state officials said could affect federal officers, arguing the DOJ failed to allege "concrete harm" or validly claim federal officers can't be prosecuted for crimes.

  2. August 04, 2026

    DOJ Calls Connecticut ICE Law 'Blantantly Unconstitutional'

    The U.S. Department of Justice pushed back against Connecticut's bid to toss the federal government's legal challenge to a state law subjecting in-custody deaths to state oversight, requiring federal agents to wear identifying badges, and banning law enforcement officers from wearing facemasks, calling the act "blatantly unconstitutional."

  3. July 14, 2026

    Conn. Defends New Laws On Face Coverings, Deadly Force

    Connecticut is urging a federal court to toss the federal government's lawsuit challenging recently enacted state laws relating to law enforcement's use of face coverings and the investigation of cases involving deadly force, arguing the laws don't unconstitutionally hamper federal enforcement efforts.

  4. May 15, 2026

    DOJ Says Conn. Has No Right To Regulate Feds' Use Of Force

    The U.S. Department of Justice on Friday sued Connecticut in federal court over a recently enacted state law that subjects in-custody deaths to state oversight, requires federal agents to wear identifying badges, and bans law enforcement officers from wearing facemasks, calling the act "blatantly unconstitutional."