Expert Analysis

• Decoding Arbitral Disputes: Tracing Paths To Award Recovery

  

  Recent subpoenas to Adidas and Hilton deployed in Blasket Renewables v. Spain, pending in D.C. federal court, show arbitration award recovery to be a disciplined exercise in constructing visibility, applying pressure and sequencing procedural advantage, says Josep Galvez at 4-5 Gray's Inn Square.

• ECJ Ruling Shows When Cos. Can Reject Data Requests

  

  The European Court of Justice’s recent decision in Brillen Rottler v. TC clarifies that although data controllers must be cautious in declining data subject access requests under the EU General Data Protection Regulation, a company may refuse to respond where the request is manifestly unfounded or excessive, even at first contact, says Rob Dalling at Jenner & Block.

• Dubai Ruling Delineates Standard For Foreign Arbitration Aid

  

  By delineating the limits of its jurisdiction with clarity, in the recent Orabelle v. Orzenia decision, the Court of First Instance of the Dubai International Financial Centre Courts enhances predictability and reinforces the court's standing as a forum combining international openness with strict adherence to statutory constraints, says Josep Galvez at 4-5 Gray's Inn.

• What Oatly's Loss Means For Plant-Based Food Industry

  

  The U.K. Supreme Court’s recent judgment in Dairy U.K. v. Oatly demonstrates that under European Union agricultural marketing regulations courts consider fair competition to take precedence over consumer protection, and that dairy labeling challenges can succeed even where there is no realistic prospect of demonstrating consumer confusion, say lawyers at TLT.

• New French In-House Privilege Reshapes Arbitration Strategy

  

  The French Constitutional Council’s recent granting of legal privilege to in-house counsel marks a structural evolution in French arbitration practice and alters the evidentiary balance of document production in cross-border disputes, although the new protection is neither absolute nor risk-free, say lawyers at King & Spalding.

• What 2nd Circ. Discovery Stay Means For Sovereign Litigation

  

  The Second Circuit’s recent stay of a postjudgment discovery order against Argentine officials in an oil investment dispute is worth examining in its full doctrinal and practical context, as limiting enforcement efforts that pry into foreign governments' internal workings could quietly reshape the trajectory of sovereign litigation in the U.S., says Josep Galvez at 4-5 Gray's Inn.

• EU Ruling Signals More Intrusion Into Commercial Arbitration

  

  Three things stand out from the recent opinion of the advocate general of the European Court of Justice in Reibel v. Stankoimport, which is the next step in a long line of measures chipping away at the viability of international arbitration in the European Union, say attorneys at BakerHostetler.

• UK Top Court Clarifies Time Limit Issue In Shareholder Claims

  

  The long-awaited U.K. Supreme Court decision in THG PLC v. Zedra Trust confirms that even historical acts can be remedied without a firm limitation date by allowing courts to order appropriate relief for unfairly prejudicial conduct, which will be welcomed by both petitioners and respondents, say lawyers at Stewarts.

• Crypto-Asset Market Downturn Is Driving Litigation Risk

  

  Recent volatility in the crypto-asset market has placed a strain on balance sheets and laid bare weaknesses that may have been overlooked during more stable periods, increasing the risk for disputes over whether procedures or enforcement have been carried out correctly, say lawyers at Kennedys.

• Decoding Arbitral Disputes: UK Top Court On State Immunity

  

  The U.K. Supreme Court's recent ruling denying Spain's and Zimbabwe's bids to escape arbitration awards using state immunity claims provides significant clarification of the relationship between sovereign immunity and the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes system, and reinforces the finality and enforceability of ICSID awards, says Josep Galvez at 4-5 Gray's Inn.

• Why UK Criminal Court Changes Need To Be Systemic

  

  The proposals in the second part of Brian Leveson's long-anticipated independent review of criminal courts, aimed at easing pressure on the criminal justice system and restoring public confidence, are broadly welcomed, but without structural change and sustained funding, they risk becoming little more than temporary fixes, says Vicky Lankester at Brett Wilson.

• UK Territories May Yet Prevail On Ownership Disclosure

  

  Despite its recently launched anti-corruption strategy, the U.K. government appears to have little appetite in the short term to impose fully public ownership registers on the overseas territories, a position that will be welcomed by advisers and individuals, says Rupert Cullen at Allectus Law.

• FCA Enforcement Newsletter Reflects Shift Toward Openness

  

  The Financial Conduct Authority’s inaugural Enforcement Watch newsletter provides clarity on the cases the regulator is opening and highlights its approach to early communication of enforcement activity, offering a welcome insight into its emerging priorities, says David Hamilton at Howard Kennedy.

• Decoding Arbitral Disputes: US Cert Denial And EU Strategy

  

  The U.S. Supreme Court recently denied certiorari in Russia v. Hulley Enterprises, leaving in place the D.C. Circuit's opinion supporting jurisdiction in the $50 billion arbitration award challenge, and intensifying litigation exposure for the European Union's strategy of contesting the enforceability of intra-EU awards abroad, says Josep Galvez at 4-5 Gray's Inn.

• Irish Consumer Law Proposals Expose Concerns Over Privacy

  

  The Irish government’s recent proposals to amend and clarify competition and consumer law would allow new investigative powers and greater financial sanctions, leading to concerns from businesses whether the benefits outweigh the privacy risks, says Kate McKenna at Matheson.