When a Florida federal judge nuked a $350 million False Claims Act verdict last month, the eye-popping reversal was announced in an opinion teeming with bare-knuckle prose — the sort of ruthless writing that has made the judge a local legal legend.
Two Florida men facing fraud charges settled a related case with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Wednesday, agreeing to be barred from penny stock offerings and securities trading to resolve civil claims that they pilfered $2.5 million selling penny stocks based on dubious nanotechnology patents.
West Palm Beach, Florida, on Wednesday urged a Florida federal court to enter an order temporarily barring the Trump administration from withholding or clawing back federal funds because of the municipality’s so-called sanctuary city policies, arguing the government’s move would violate federal laws and the U.S. Constitution.
The Eleventh Circuit ruled Tuesday that a drug trafficking conviction against an Argentinian woman did not constitute an aggravated felony because the Florida narcotics statute was categorically overbroad, granting her petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals decision that disqualified her from cancellation of removal.
Blackstone is said to have sold an Illinois office property for $47 million, Angelo Gordon has reportedly sold a Florida apartment complex for $64 million, and mall real estate investment trust GGP is said to have bought an Illinois Macy's store for $25 million and leased it back to the retailer.
Miami-Dade County sued the Miami Marlins on Friday, claiming the Major League Baseball team is withholding a 5 percent cut of profits from the team’s $1.2 billion sale under the terms of a 2009 contract for public financing of the team’s $600 million stadium.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to hear an attorney's appeal of a sanctions order to write a 5,000-word essay on the consequences of ignoring court orders, and to pay attorneys' fees.
Ponzi-scheme suspect Robert Shapiro asked a Florida federal court Tuesday to dismiss the Securities and Exchange Commission’s case against him, saying the mortgage notes he sold were not securities.
Electronic medical records company ZenCharts LLC responded Friday to a $30 million suit by rival Kipu Systems, denying claims it ripped off Kipu's cloud-based records system and adding its own counterclaims that Kipu has interfered with its legitimate efforts to build a superior system.
Hair products manufacturer Monat was hit with a proposed class action Tuesday in Florida federal court alleging the company misrepresents that its products are safe and can aid in hair regrowth, when in reality they can cause irritation and hair loss.
A traffic ticket law firm asked a Florida federal court Monday to sanction traffic ticket services startup TIKD for filing an $11.4 million antitrust lawsuit against the firm and The Florida Bar, calling the case an effort to “try to legitimize its own unlicensed practice of law.”
The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to take up the appeal of two Florida mental health counselors who tried to get new trials after they were convicted of conspiracy for their roles in a $63 million Medicare and Medicaid fraud and kickback scheme.
Unions representing Disney World workers filed a federal labor complaint on Monday claiming Disney has improperly withheld $1,000 bonuses announced by the company after Congress passed the GOP tax cut bill.
Getting a tort reform or other state law ruled unconstitutional is no easy task, but Robert Peck has managed to make a career out of it, traveling across the country and helping to smash roadblocks for the personal injury plaintiffs bar, including a seminal take-down of Florida’s cap on noneconomic damages.
Major League Baseball's Tampa Bay Rays urged a Florida federal court Friday to deny concessionaire Centerplate's bid to escape the ball club's breach of contract suit over an expiring 20-year pact, saying it has provided no basis and relies on “unfounded accusations.”
The Southern District of Florida's bankruptcy court has adopted guidelines for communication and cooperation between courts in cross-border insolvency matters that practitioners say will help courts efficiently handle the increasing number of Chapter 15 cases filed in the region as its ties to Latin America continue to strengthen.
A Florida federal judge tossed EEOC claims that a Massage Envy franchise owner illegally fired an employee with plans to visit Ghana on fears she would return with the Ebola virus, finding Thursday she did not qualify as disabled under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Florida's Judicial Qualifications Commission recommended Thursday that a state judge be removed after finding him guilty of violating several judicial rules in a series of incidents, led by his posting of false information about an election opponent on his own campaign website.
A Florida federal judge on Friday tossed an Uber driver’s proposed class action alleging the rideshare giant’s rule prohibiting drivers and passengers from carrying a gun violates their constitutional rights, finding that the driver has not claimed he’s been harmed by the policy and therefore can’t sue.
A Florida appeals panel Friday revived a malpractice suit claiming that part of a robot left inside a patient’s body for years following a hernia surgery contributed to his untimely death, as it disagreed with a lower court that the allegations were vague or already dismissed.
Any cannabis business that is holding its breath waiting for the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to start registering cannabis-related trademarks should give up. But those located in states that have legalized recreational and/or medicinal cannabis should immediately seek state trademark registration where available, says Joshua Cohen, leader of Wendel Rosen Black & Dean LLP's intellectual property group.
Post-TC Heartland, an increasingly common venue dispute revolves around whether a patent defendant must have its "regular and established place of business" in the judicial district when filing the complaint, or only when the alleged act of infringement occurred. Two recent district court decisions appear to answer this question differently, say Brian Kwok and Winnie Wong of Haynes and Boone LLP.
Late last year, the Sedona Conference released the third edition of its principles addressing electronic document production, updated to account for innovations like Snapchat and Twitter. It may be necessary for these principles to be updated more often in order to keep pace with technology, says Charles McGee III of Murphy & McGonigle LLP.
Last week, the District of Delaware raised eyebrows by ruling that documents provided to a litigation funder and its counsel in connection with their due diligence are categorically not attorney work product. Acceleration Bay v. Activision Blizzard seems to be a case of bad facts making bad law, says David Gallagher, investment manager and legal counsel for Bentham IMF.
Artificial intelligence tools can empower attorneys to work more efficiently, deepen and broaden their areas of expertise, and provide increased value to clients, which in turn can improve legal transparency, dispute resolution and access to justice. But there are some common pitfalls already apparent in the legal industry, say Ben Allgrove and Yoon Chae of Baker McKenzie.
As Telephone Consumer Protection Act cases rarely result in favorable trial outcomes for creditors and loan servicers, there are several key practice points from a Florida federal court’s recent decision in Larry Harrington v. RoundPoint Mortgage Servicing, say Eve Cann and Keith Andress of Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz PC.
In "Justice and Empathy: Toward a Constitutional Ideal," the late Yale Law School professor Robert Burt makes a compelling case for the undeniable role of the courts in protecting the vulnerable and oppressed. But the question of how the judiciary might conform to Burt’s expectations raises practical problems, says U.S. Circuit Judge Allyson Duncan of the Fourth Circuit.
In the hopes of piquing the interest of jurors and minimizing hardship requests, more and more judges are encouraging parties to make “mini-openings” prior to voir dire. You can use this as an opportunity to identify your worst jurors and get them removed from the panel — by previewing your case weaknesses and withholding your strengths, says Christina Marinakis of Litigation Insights.
When states and municipalities rebuild permanent infrastructure following disasters, they may be able to reduce the damages caused by eminent domain by planning carefully. In particular, examining preventative solutions allows more time for planning and designing projects to reduce future damages to owners, says Briggs Stahl of RGL Forensics.
Multidistrict litigation is an ever-expanding driver of product liability litigation, but when the MDL process runs its course there is often still a trial to be had, and there are strategic and practical decisions to consider once a case has been remanded. Brandon Cox and Charissa Walker of Tucker Ellis LLP offer tips on how to navigate the remand process.